Skip to main content
Apragya AI
HR app feature

Employees Software for Indian Businesses: One Record per Person, From Offer to Exit

For owners, HR teams and managers at Indian SMEs: one employee record that leave, attendance, letters and payroll all read from.

An HR executive opening one drawer of a tall cabinet with many small drawers

Every HR process reads the same record, which is why it has to be right. Employees software in Apragya keeps one record per person with personal details, role, department, reporting line, documents, bank details and statutory numbers, so onboarding, leave, attendance and payroll all start from the same facts.

Most small companies hold this in a spreadsheet that began with ten rows. By the time there are seventy, it has three versions, a column for UAN that is half empty, and a reporting line that was right two reorganisations ago.

Below is what a weak master costs, an illustrative clean-up at a textile trader, and how Apragya keeps one person, one record, from offer to exit.

An example: cleaning up the staff list at a Surat textile trader

Take an illustrative textile trading firm in Surat with 70 people across a warehouse, two shops and an office. Before its first payroll run in Apragya, HR imports the staff spreadsheet and checks what is missing.

What the import check found

Employee master, 70 records

  • Personal detailsNames, contacts and emergency contacts in place.Done
  • Reporting lineSix people still reported to a manager who left.Mismatch
  • PAN and UANNine records without a UAN.Missing
  • Bank detailsVerified once, used every month.Checked
  • DocumentsOffer letters found for most, not all.Pending
  • AccessSalary fields hidden from shop managers.Ready
Every gap was found at import, before any of it could hold up a salary.

HR fixed the six reporting lines in an afternoon and asked the nine people for their UANs that week. By the time the first run came round, every record carried the same set of facts, and the shop managers could see their teams without seeing what anyone earned.

An open folder of five coloured cards joined by an emerald ribbon beside a small key
Personal details, role, documents, statutory numbers and history. One folder, one person.

What changes when the master is one record

One record per person

  • One record that every process reads
  • PAN and UAN required at joining
  • Approvals follow the current reporting line
  • Every change kept with its effective date
  • Sensitive fields restricted by role

How Apragya keeps one employee record

Step 1 of 5

Created at onboarding

The record starts when an offer is accepted, not on the first payday.

  1. Created at onboarding: The record starts when an offer is accepted, not on the first payday.
  2. Required fields enforced: Statutory numbers and bank details are asked for at joining.
  3. Changes dated: Role, pay, location and manager changes carry an effective date.
  4. Fields restricted: Salary, bank and ID fields are visible only to the roles you choose.
  5. Read everywhere: Leave, attendance, letters and payroll all read the same record.

Why employee database software in India needs one source of truth

Payroll, compliance and approvals all fail on the same missing field. Employee master data management is not about a nicer list, it is about every process reading one set of facts, with history kept and access controlled, instead of each team keeping its own copy.

A staff spreadsheet, against Apragya

FeatureStaff spreadsheetApragya
VersionsSeveral, all slightly differentOne record per person
HistoryOverwrittenEvery change with its effective date
ApprovalsRouted by memoryRouted by the reporting line
Salary and bank fieldsVisible to anyone with the fileRestricted by role
Self-service updatesEmailed to HRSent for HR approval in the app
Data requestsSearched by handHandled from the record

Checked against public information on 16 September 2026.

What sets Apragya's employee record apart

One record, every app

HR, payroll and projects share the same people data.

Access down to sub-features

A manager sees the team without seeing salaries.

Data Privacy & Audit Trail

Sensitive data protection with a complete record of every change.

Self-service

Staff update their own details, with sensitive fields approved by HR.

Your fields

Add the fields your business needs without a developer.

Gaps found for you

An agent you set up can flag records missing what payroll needs.

A person is created during onboarding, their papers live in employee documents, and their pay runs through payroll.

Setting up your employee master

  1. Export your current staff list and import it.
  2. Fix reporting lines first, because approvals depend on them.
  3. Make PAN, UAN and bank details required for every new joiner.
  4. Set who can see salary, bank and ID fields.
  5. Let staff check and update their own details from the app.

A clean master is quiet work. It is also why the rest of HR stops needing workarounds.

What it costs to start

Free
Up to 3 users
HR included, with CRM and any 1 Additional App
1,000
AI Credits
On the free plan
INR 3,999
Starter, a month
Up to 10 users and 2,000 AI Credits

Employee records, answered

Who can see salary and bank details?
Role-based access down to sub-features decides it, so a manager can see their team without seeing salaries.
Can we keep a history of role changes?
Yes. Every change carries an effective date, which is what increments, transfers and audits need.
Can employees update their own details?
Where you allow it, with changes to sensitive fields sent for HR approval before they apply.
How is personal data protected?
Access is restricted by role, sensitive fields can be masked, and data records can be securely managed and updated from within the system.
What does it cost to start?
HRMS is part of the free plan, which supports up to 3 users with CRM, one additional app, and 1,000 AI Credits. The Starter plan, at INR 3,999 per month, supports up to 10 users and adds a choice of enterprise apps.

Start from one clean employee record

Import your staff list and see which gaps would have held up the next payroll.